|
Conservation estate | Principles
for parks | Non-Indigenous occupation
| Indigenous dispossession
|
"It
is important to realise that as Indigenous people the environment
and culture are one and the same, they co-exist and are not separate".
Melissa
George, a Wulgurukaba woman and a Traditional Owner
of the Magnetic Island and Townsville areas
"Cultural
heritage forms the very fabric of our society, our spirituality
and our connection with our lands and our very existence. Our waters,
our seaways, our skies, our airspace, they're all a part of the
complete cycle of who we are and what we're about".
Bob
Anderson, of the Queensland Indigenous Advisory Board
A
proposal for an Indigenous Conservation Estate
From the Queensland Indigenous Working Group's
Working
Draft for discussion and negotiation purposes
A
summit of indigenous representatives from throughout Queensland
was held in Brisbane in April 1999 to discuss the state of recognition
of indigenous ownership and management of protected areas. Indigenous
people have a deep interest in all protected areas within their
traditional country and, while they acknowledge that existing national
park land must continue to remain for national park purposes, ownership
and management control must rest with the rightful indigenous owners.
Summit
Preamble - April 1999
·
RECALLING that Aboriginal people have owned the land on which all
national parks are located since time immemorial and continue to
so own;
·
RECOGNISING that since the recognition of native title the creation
of national parks is an unremedied appropriation of Aboriginal land;
·
NOTING that the Queensland Government desires to reform existing
arrangements for accommodating Aboriginal rights and ownership of
land including national park land;
·
FURTHER noting the extensive obligation of the Queensland Government
to respect the rights and ownership of national parks by Aboriginal
people under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Qld), the Aboriginal
Land Act 1991 (Qld), the Native Title Act 1993 (Commonwealth), equity
and the common law, the International Covenant for the Elimination
of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention on Biodiversity;
·
CALLING on the Queensland Government to recognise, in negotiation,
the position of Aboriginal owners as land owners and parties of
equal status rather than relegating Aboriginal people to the position
of 'stakeholders' or 'interest groups' and the imperative for a
lasting commitment by Government to engaging Aboriginal people on
this basis
back
to top...
Principles
THAT
the following principles have the united support of Aboriginal owner
delegates and NTRBs attending the summit.
·
Process including adequate timetable and provision of resources
THAT
we call on the Government to implement a fair and equitable process
including a reasonable timetable to enable adequate State wide Aboriginal
approval of new policy for Aboriginal rights in, and ownership of,
national parks and to provide adequate resources for the process
AND
THAT in negotiating a fair process we call on the Government to
recognise and fulfil Australia's international convention obligations
on the rights of Aboriginal people and the environment
- ·
Land Tenures and Lease Arrangements
THAT
the Government recognise and accept Aboriginal ownership of national
parks including all cultural and intellectual property throughout
Queensland to enable the development of an Aboriginal conservation
estate
AND
THAT national parks will not diminish or extinguish any rights from
Aboriginal ownership, nor prevent the exercise of such rights
AND
THAT the Government provide secure land tenure directly to Aboriginal
owner bodies, where Aboriginal land ownership exists, throughout
the Queensland conservation estate
AND
THAT we will never accept perpetual leases, of our country, back
to the Government
AND
THAT where Aboriginal land negotiations have determined that Aboriginal
land is to be used for national park purposes, the Government will
compensate Aboriginal owners for the loss of full use and enjoyment
of Aboriginal land in the form of a negotiated annual rental payment
or package
THAT
sole Aboriginal management, through a management structure acceptable
to traditional owners for land in national parks is the primary
goal and obligation of Government and that there should be flexibility
of land management models as an outcome of negotiating the care,
control and management of national park land
AND
THAT this primary goal should be implemented through negotiation
of ILUA or similar agreements
AND
THAT the management of permits becomes an integral part of Aboriginal
care, control and management of national park land
AND
THAT in the setting of standards of Aboriginal management arrangements
that no one model can diminish the opportunity for stronger arrangements
with another Aboriginal group
AND
THAT culturally appropriate management plans for Aboriginal national
park land be developed by Aboriginal owners detailing how care,
control and management will be implemented with appropriate resources
from government for development and implementation of the management
plan
-
Government commitment to national park management and recurrent
funding for Aboriginal national parks
THAT
the Government's past and current commitment to, and coordination
of government agencies for, national park management is deplorable
and that adequate recurrent funding for Aboriginal management services
is provided as part of Aboriginal management agreements on Aboriginal
national park land and efficient coordination of government agencies
be ensured · Access, living areas and exclusive use areas
THAT
any new Aboriginal management arrangements provide unlimited access
to Aboriginal land for traditional owners, living areas for Aboriginal
owners and powers being vested in Aboriginal owners to control and
police public access to areas of cultural sensitivity
AND
THAT access for other commercial and research purposes shall be
determined and controlled by the Aboriginal management structure
· Hunting and use of natural resources
THAT
Aboriginal management arrangements on national park land include
the right to hunt and use other natural resources, in accordance
with Aboriginal tradition and Aboriginal management plans
- Existing
legislation and administration of legislation by Government agencies
THAT
existing legislation dealing with Aboriginal rights in, and ownership
of, national parks, and existing administration of that legislation
is inadequate and requires amendment, replacement and reform, with
the informed Aboriginal consent, to implement Aboriginal land tenure
and management arrangements on national park land
- Reform
of administrative arrangements
THAT
an independent government agency (appropriately resourced, managed
by and governed by an Aboriginal majority) be created with responsibility
for the implementation of new Aboriginal land tenure and management
arrangements in consultation with traditional owners
- Employment,
training and capacity building
THAT
adequate and culturally appropriate Aboriginal employment, Training
and capacity packages, are essential to implementing Aboriginal
care, control and management of Aboriginal national park land;
AND
THAT Aboriginal positions and funding for those positions within
national park or marine park structures should be negotiated directly
with traditional owners
AND
THAT Aboriginal management agencies already exist, those positions
should be immediately transferred to the agencies to assist with
capacity building to run national parks
THAT
the Government recognise that Aboriginal owners are entitled to
compensation for all activity - past, present and future - on Aboriginal
land affecting Aboriginal rights and we would seek negotiated outcomes
rather than litigation
- Recognition
of traditional knowledge of country and traditional ownership
THAT
the Government recognise that Aboriginal people are the true and
only decision makers regarding the identification of Aboriginal
traditional land owners and the location of our traditional estates
AND
THAT Government has no role in the resolution of internal disputes
amongst Aboriginal people
- Intellectual
and cultural property rights
THAT
the Government accept and recognise that Aboriginal people hold
Aboriginal scientific knowledge and own intellectual and cultural
property concerning land, air, water and cultural resources
AND
THAT traditional owners are the holders of true knowledge of country
and that knowledge is of superior status to Western academic systems
of knowledge
AND
THAT bio-prospecting using any form of Aboriginal knowledge should
only occur with the prior informed consent of the traditional owners
of that knowledge
AND
THAT Aboriginal intellectual property be protected by formal agreement
in every Aboriginal management arrangement AND THAT traditional
owners have the exclusive right to control the use of cultural knowledge
in the interpretation and presentation of national parks
THAT
the government recognise the landscape is integral to Aboriginal
cultural values;
AND
THAT the Government provide resources for culturally appropriate
research to assist in the preservation and recovery of Aboriginal
cultural knowledge
- Commercial
rights in national parks
THAT
Aboriginal land ownership provides a right to gain an economic benefit
from our land including, in accordance with Aboriginal management
plans, the development of appropriate commercial enterprises on
Aboriginal national parks
AND
THAT, given the Government's promotion of the commercial use of
national parks, traditional owners be guaranteed access to commercial
opportunities, a first right of refusal and benefits
·
Conflict resolution process including Aboriginal process and independent
arbitration
THAT
a culturally appropriate conflict resolution process for disputes
between government and traditional owners concerning national park
management be created including, where appropriate, independent
Aboriginal arbitrators to resolve conflicts which may arise in the
management of Aboriginal national parks
THAT
all cultural heritage control and management is the exclusive right
of Aboriginal owners and that ownership and management arrangements
in relation to Indigenous cultural heritage be implemented in every
Aboriginal national park
- Audit
of existing condition of national park land
THAT
the government provide, prior to the settlement of new Aboriginal
tenure and management arrangements an audit of the condition of
natural values, fixed assets, national park regional administration,
recurrent budgets and revenue generation of national park land in
order for Aboriginal owners to be able to make adequate arrangements
for the protection of these values and other assets
THAT
no new national parks be created in Queensland without the informed
consent of traditional owners
AND
THAT where new parks are created with the informed consent of traditional
owners, the parks become a new category of Aboriginal Conservation
Estate
back
to top...
Non-indigenous
occupation and indigenous dispossession
From
the Indigenous Land Corporation
Regional
Indigenous Land Strategy 1996 - 2001
Queensland
Regional Area
Key
factors in non-indigenous occupation
The
following key factors are considered as having major historical
and contemporary impact on the dispossession of indigenous people
in the Queensland Regional Area -
·
Intense non-indigenous occupation of the south eastern corner, from
the settlement of Redcliffe as a penal colony on the Brisbane River
in September 1824 followed by the end of the convict era in 1839
and free settlement of the Moreton Bay district in 1842, has continued
to the present.
Extensive
exploitation of coastal lands for:
-
Sugar
cane farms, other intensive cropping and cattle
-
Decentralised
development and the growth of major provincial centres
-
Fishing,
shipping and other marine activities
-
Tourism
and recreation
-
National
parks and other reserves
-
Extensive
development of the cattle industry and the issuing of pastoral
leases throughout most of Queensland west of the Great Dividing
Range
-
Mining,
railways, roads and related infrastructure development
-
Forestry
and other natural resource exploitation in the eastern part
-
Development
of major water resource projects
-
Large
percentage of freehold title to land in central and southern
regions
As
a result of these factors, non-indigenous occupation since the early
1800's has had an impact on nearly all indigenous peoples in Queensland
and has resulted in a low incidence of indigenous land ownership.
back
to top...
Key
factors in indigenous dispossession
The
history of dispossession of indigenous peoples in Queensland is
dominated by widespread conflict, warfare, and, in some cases, policies
to "solve" the problems caused by the active and long-running resistance
of indigenous peoples to the non-indigenous occupation of their
lands. Large scale massacres and poisoning of indigenous people
took place, which resulted in the destruction of whole groups or
dispersal from their traditional country.
The
dispossession of Aboriginal people in Queensland took place over
a prolonged period, from the very first contact with non-Aboriginal
colonists at Moreton Bay in the early nineteenth century to the
forced removal of the Aboriginal community at Mapoon in 1963 in
order to accommodate the exploitation of bauxite deposits, and arguably
beyond then.
The
reminiscences of one non-Aboriginal colonist published in 1904 quoted
one of the dispossessed as saying:
"[We]
were hunted from our ground, shot, poisoned and had our daughters
sisters and wives taken from us ... They stole our ground where
we used to get food, and when we got hungry and took a bit of
flour or killed a bullock to eat, they shot us or poisoned us.
All they give us now for our land is a blanket once a year."
A
policy of systematic dislocation, dispossession and extermination
by, among others, the Queensland Native Police, is well-documented
and characterised the colonisation of Queensland until the latter
part of the nineteenth century Progressively from the latter part
of the nineteenth century, colonial government policies began to
reflect the reality of economic life in Queensland's pastoral and
sugar cane industries in which Aboriginal labour was indispensable
during their establishment phases.
A
system of dedicated Aboriginal "reserves" and church-run missions
was developed as a mechanism for the convenient administration of
Aboriginal policy and as a guarantee of the easier availability
of a cheap - and in some cases, free - pool of labour for use in
the development of the Queensland economy. The concentration of
Aboriginal people into government regulated settlements required
that large numbers of Aboriginal people be forcefully relocated
from their traditional lands. The legislation, which authorised
the confinement of individual Aboriginal people to reserves, also
contained draconian provisions regulating virtually all aspects
of Aboriginal life.
A
responsible official could, for example, decide who should be removed
from a reserve, who could enter a contract of employment and under
what conditions, who could marry whom and whether Aboriginal children
could remain with their families, what rights of private property
ownership an individual Aboriginal person might enjoy and so on.
The
historical legacy for Aboriginal people in Queensland is one of
widespread dislocation from traditional lands, more pronounced in
(but by no means confined to) the southern and eastern parts of
the State. Throughout Queensland, traditional owners have in many
places been a minority in their own country for several generations
and traditional owners of one area may well have been relocated
many hundreds of kilometres distant from their country for decades.
In virtually all cases, contemporary economic and political marginalisation
has attended dispossession on such a wide scale.
back
to top...
|